Showing posts with label police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 July 2011

Rob Ford: Bad math and police layoffs

Layoffs loom for police and city staff - thestar.com
Back in May 2011, Rob Ford gave the Toronto Police a big raise. Now, he wants to lay them off. The need for police layoffs could have been greatly reduced if he hadn't given them such a big raise. Ford is already having to deal with the mistakes he made earlier this year.

People, please take note. Did you vote for Rob Ford? Is the councillor you elected voting in support of all Ford's mistakes? Next time, don't just vote for sound bites, take a little time to review the candidates' policies and records.

Saturday, 11 June 2011

Toronto G20: One thug down, many to go.

Toronto police officer charged in G20 assault - thestar.com
Many more officers guilty of assault causing bodily harm will remain at large and uncharged due to a system that fails ordinary citizens when trusted police officers break the law.

Saturday, 10 July 2010

G20 Toronto - Inch by inch, we come closer to the truth

We are another baby step closer to the truth about who may have given the orders to a) stand down and let vandals smash windows and burn police cars for 1.5 hours, and b) to attack, arrest and detain hundreds of innocents in an unjust fashion.

Today, as reported in the Toronto Star and the Globe & Mail, it has been revealed that Bill Blair was misled (and he, in turn, misled his officers), and that there were times when he was not exactly calling the shots regarding the police downtown (outside the Security Area).

Excerpt from: Toronto Star: Chain of Command Questioned in G20
[I have added the emphasis below.]
At no time was there ever one person unilaterally calling the shots. The complex command structure designed for the G20 had Toronto’s command centre, run by Toronto police, in constant consultations with the federally led Integrated Security Unit based in Barrie.

Earlier this week, the police board announced it would launch a civilian review of the G20’s “multijurisdictional” policing model. A central goal of the investigation is to uncover the command structure and who each body was accountable to, said chair Alok Mukherjee.

The Toronto Police Services Board, the Gold Standard for civilian oversight in the country, says it was not kept in the loop throughout the G20 planning. Board members say they felt the ISU deliberately cut them out of the process.

Meanwhile, provincial Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services Rick Bartolucci – who oversees the OPP – and federal Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews – who oversees the RCMP – were both kept informed throughout the planning process and the situation on the ground during the summit.

“A big part of the reason I called the review is to precisely understand who had what jurisdiction during the G20,” said Mukherjee. “I think what is fair to say is that the board is trying to understand who was in charge at different points in time.”

Mayor David Miller, who has stood behind the chief and the board, said even he was left in the dark.

“There are legitimate public policy questions,” said Miller. “Who was the Integrated Security Unit reporting to? . . . Who’s in charge? Are they reporting to the prime minister? Because that’s ultimately the oversight of the RCMP. Are they reporting to the premier? Because that’s ultimately the oversight of the OPP. The premier and the prime minister, did they agree on a security plan? How did that all work?”

The ISU, a federally led security strategy, is the same model that was used during the Olympics. The RCMP commissioner put his Chief Superintendent Alphonse MacNeil in charge.

MacNeil oversaw the assembly of a five-member command team, made up of top officers from the RCMP, OPP, Canadian Armed forces, and Toronto and Peel police forces. They would be based in Barrie and monitor what was happening on Toronto streets by video and ground reports.

A local major incident command centre was set up at Toronto police headquarters. Two senior officers, Supts. Hugh Ferguson and Mark Fenton, were the commanding officers on a rotating shift basis.

The ISU was to be responsible for everything inside the summit fences. Toronto police were to protect everything outside the perimeter.

When concerns arose about what authority police would have to search suspicious individuals near the fence, ISU officials asked Blair to get the province to designate summit zones as part of the Public Works Protection Act. Blair, according to sources, saw no need. He argued police officers were already empowered to ask for identification and search suspicious individuals under common law.

But he did as requested.

ISU lawyers incorrectly briefed Blair’s legal team on the legislation. Blair was told anyone within five metres of the fence would be subject to the act. So when news of the so-called “secret law” broke the Friday of the G20 weekend and Blair was summoned to explain, he was left clarifying something he didn’t fully understand.

The province contacted him that afternoon to explain he had been misinformed about the five metres. When the truth came out after the G20, it appeared as if the chief had purposely misled the public, when in reality, he really wasn’t informed, said one board member.

In retrospect, Bartolucci says he wishes his ministry had issued a clarification.

“Hindsight is 20/20,” he said.

As the only obvious target for criticism, Blair has been left to answer to allegations of police wrongdoing, including the controversial crowd-control tactics used the Sunday evening.

But on that day, when police corralled hundreds of people at Queen St. W. and Spadina Ave. during a heavy rainstorm, the chain of command between the ISU and Toronto police was even less transparent.

After several hours of heated debate, Blair eventually stepped in again and demanded everyone at the intersection be released, but only after hundreds of others had been arrested and taken to a detention centre.


In The Globe & Mail: G20 Review Will Focus On Decision-Making Process, Alok Mukherjee, the chair of the Toronto Police Services Board, said:
That reviewer will also make clear which decisions were up to Toronto Police, which came from the RCMP, and which directions were issued by the Integrated Security Unit from its command post in Barrie, Ont.


What is missing here is finding out if the RCMP consulted or was given suggestions or took orders from a person or persons in the federal government (like the Federal Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, or from Prime Minister Stephen Harper). Considering that the actions of the police to allow prolonged vandalism, and then attack and arrest hundreds of innocent people were not standard typical procedures (in view of protecting people and property, and keeping the public safety), it seems that they must have been taking orders from someone outside the police/RCMP structure.

All the talk of reviews is fine and dandy, but what it all boils down to is: who ultimately gave the orders to stand down and allow prolonged vandalism and to attack and arrest hundreds of innocents (and to remove rights during detention of these people)? Whoever ultimately gave these orders/(made these directions) is the person (or persons) who should be brought up on criminal charges. If someone above Bill Blair or Alphonse MacNeil directed them in these matters, then that someone must be held accountable.

G20 Toronto - Inch by inch, we come closer to the truth

We are another baby step closer to the truth about who may have given the orders to a) stand down and let vandals smash windows and burn police cars for 1.5 hours, and b) to attack, arrest and detain hundreds of innocents in an unjust fashion.

Today, as reported in the Toronto Star and the Globe & Mail, it has been revealed that Bill Blair was misled (and he, in turn, misled his officers), and that there were times when he was not exactly calling the shots regarding the police downtown (outside the Security Area).

Excerpt from: Toronto Star: Chain of Command Questioned in G20
[I have added the emphasis below.]
At no time was there ever one person unilaterally calling the shots. The complex command structure designed for the G20 had Toronto’s command centre, run by Toronto police, in constant consultations with the federally led Integrated Security Unit based in Barrie.

Earlier this week, the police board announced it would launch a civilian review of the G20’s “multijurisdictional” policing model. A central goal of the investigation is to uncover the command structure and who each body was accountable to, said chair Alok Mukherjee.

The Toronto Police Services Board, the Gold Standard for civilian oversight in the country, says it was not kept in the loop throughout the G20 planning. Board members say they felt the ISU deliberately cut them out of the process.

Meanwhile, provincial Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services Rick Bartolucci – who oversees the OPP – and federal Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews – who oversees the RCMP – were both kept informed throughout the planning process and the situation on the ground during the summit.

“A big part of the reason I called the review is to precisely understand who had what jurisdiction during the G20,” said Mukherjee. “I think what is fair to say is that the board is trying to understand who was in charge at different points in time.”

Mayor David Miller, who has stood behind the chief and the board, said even he was left in the dark.

“There are legitimate public policy questions,” said Miller. “Who was the Integrated Security Unit reporting to? . . . Who’s in charge? Are they reporting to the prime minister? Because that’s ultimately the oversight of the RCMP. Are they reporting to the premier? Because that’s ultimately the oversight of the OPP. The premier and the prime minister, did they agree on a security plan? How did that all work?”

The ISU, a federally led security strategy, is the same model that was used during the Olympics. The RCMP commissioner put his Chief Superintendent Alphonse MacNeil in charge.

MacNeil oversaw the assembly of a five-member command team, made up of top officers from the RCMP, OPP, Canadian Armed forces, and Toronto and Peel police forces. They would be based in Barrie and monitor what was happening on Toronto streets by video and ground reports.

A local major incident command centre was set up at Toronto police headquarters. Two senior officers, Supts. Hugh Ferguson and Mark Fenton, were the commanding officers on a rotating shift basis.

The ISU was to be responsible for everything inside the summit fences. Toronto police were to protect everything outside the perimeter.

When concerns arose about what authority police would have to search suspicious individuals near the fence, ISU officials asked Blair to get the province to designate summit zones as part of the Public Works Protection Act. Blair, according to sources, saw no need. He argued police officers were already empowered to ask for identification and search suspicious individuals under common law.

But he did as requested.

ISU lawyers incorrectly briefed Blair’s legal team on the legislation. Blair was told anyone within five metres of the fence would be subject to the act. So when news of the so-called “secret law” broke the Friday of the G20 weekend and Blair was summoned to explain, he was left clarifying something he didn’t fully understand.

The province contacted him that afternoon to explain he had been misinformed about the five metres. When the truth came out after the G20, it appeared as if the chief had purposely misled the public, when in reality, he really wasn’t informed, said one board member.

In retrospect, Bartolucci says he wishes his ministry had issued a clarification.

“Hindsight is 20/20,” he said.

As the only obvious target for criticism, Blair has been left to answer to allegations of police wrongdoing, including the controversial crowd-control tactics used the Sunday evening.

But on that day, when police corralled hundreds of people at Queen St. W. and Spadina Ave. during a heavy rainstorm, the chain of command between the ISU and Toronto police was even less transparent.

After several hours of heated debate, Blair eventually stepped in again and demanded everyone at the intersection be released, but only after hundreds of others had been arrested and taken to a detention centre.


In The Globe & Mail: G20 Review Will Focus On Decision-Making Process, Alok Mukherjee, the chair of the Toronto Police Services Board, said:
That reviewer will also make clear which decisions were up to Toronto Police, which came from the RCMP, and which directions were issued by the Integrated Security Unit from its command post in Barrie, Ont.


What is missing here is finding out if the RCMP consulted or was given suggestions or took orders from a person or persons in the federal government (like the Federal Minister of Public Safety, Vic Toews, or from Prime Minister Stephen Harper). Considering that the actions of the police to allow prolonged vandalism, and then attack and arrest hundreds of innocent people were not standard typical procedures (in view of protecting people and property, and keeping the public safety), it seems that they must have been taking orders from someone outside the police/RCMP structure.

All the talk of reviews is fine and dandy, but what it all boils down to is: who ultimately gave the orders to stand down and allow prolonged vandalism and to attack and arrest hundreds of innocents (and to remove rights during detention of these people)? Whoever ultimately gave these orders/(made these directions) is the person (or persons) who should be brought up on criminal charges. If someone above Bill Blair or Alphonse MacNeil directed them in these matters, then that someone must be held accountable.

Tuesday, 6 July 2010

G20 Toronto - "It was more than I wanted to see"

‘It was more than I wanted to see’ « justin & lex @ g20

Lost, hungry, cold and scared they left the makeshift detention
centre at 629 Eastern Ave. one-by-one. To greet them were strangers who
had come with food, drinks and clothes.


Over six hours on the night of June 27 we spoke to nearly 120 of the
detainees to leave the Toronto Film Studio, a soundstage retrofit with
cages to hold people arrested during the G20 summit. Although each had a
different story to tell, the larger picture remained constant.

...

"Arrest Orgy". And, innocents still in jail

CathiefromCanada: "Arrest orgy" is what it was
Some interesting insight from CathiefromCanada and Galloping Beaver
regarding inherent police force problems.
And
Today we finally found out that 16
people are still in jail
a week after the G20 ended -- including a
street medic who is apparently going to be charged with carrying a
concealed weapon for carrying bandage shears.
And a woman from
Peterborough has
been charged
with obstructing police and wearing a disguise with
intent to commit an indictable offence -- she came to the protests
dressed as a clown.

Monday, 5 July 2010

G20 Toronto - Security was run from a secret command centre in Barrie

RCMP unveil secret summit command centre - The Globe and Mail
The command centre served as the central nervous system of the whole
operation, staffed by 80 police officers, security agents and military
personnel.

Sunday, 4 July 2010

G20 Toronto - Official complaint launched with the UN

G20 protesters reportedly launching complaint with UN - The Globe and Mail

"The League of
Rights and Freedoms has put the matter to the Commission on Human Rights
of the UN.
Reached by telephone
by TVA News, the lawyer Julius Grey welcomed this approach.

"It is possible that some people have committed offences, but in
general we have seen the kind of behaviour that leads us to think we live
in a state less democratic than before," he protested.
I call it a
totalitarian democracy. "

G20 Toronto - The G20 summit's grim lessons for civil liberties

Walkom: The G20 summit’s grim lessons for civil liberties - thestar.com

Two things stand out from the street riots and subsequent police
actions that swept downtown Toronto last weekend.


The first is the state blatantly abused its powers. Summits
legitimately require security; but in this one, governments went over
the top.


The federal government transformed the city’s downtown into a no-go
zone. The provincial government secretly passed new regulations to give
police extraordinary search and seizure powers and then, when citizens
found out, pretended that it hadn’t. The police used their authority to
prevent breaches of the peace as an excuse to jail citizens who were
committing no crimes


The second is that most people don’t care. Polls show that more
than 70 per cent of Torontonians approve of these abuses.

...

G20 Toronto - Toronto Sun Columnist Rachal Sa on detention conditions

G20 prisoner #0106: Sa | Rachel Sa | Columnists | Comment | Toronto Sun
...

Maybe you believe that anyone near a G20 protest should have expected
to be arrested, whether they were protesting or not, violent or not.



But even if that is so, no one — violent protestor, peaceful
activist, or regular citizen in the wrong place at the wrong time —
deserved the sadistic treatment.



This cannot rest, no matter how many lame justifications or
show-and-tell displays the police stage. The damage done to the psyche
of the city is far more severe than the broken windows and senseless
vandalism inflicted by the handful of idiot anarchists — and it will
take much longer to heal.

...


Saturday, 3 July 2010

Who was really pulling the police strings at the G20 protest?

The Louis Riel Trail: Iron Heel Harper and the G20 Protests
...
If you look at Canadian history, you'll find that Regina Riot was
carried out in large part due to the orders of Prime Minister Richard
Bedford Bennett (earning him the nickname "Iron Heel Bennett"), and in
somewhat more recent times the FLQ crisis was handled in large part
through Pierre Trudeau's implementation of the War Measures act. Both
of these Prime Ministers saw big threats to the Canadian way of life,
and exercised a significant degree of control over police actions during
those major security events.

Today the interference of the PMO
or other politicians in law enforcement is generally considered an abuse
of political power and something the police should reject
: "The RCMP must instil (sic)
in its officers, by whatever educational or other means available, that
they are to brook no intrusion or interference from government officials
with respect to the provision of security services" (the APEC
commission final report
)

I just have a sense that the
problems that occurred during the G20 protests go beyond local
bureaucrats in Toronto.

Look at some of the things Stockwell Day has been
saying to the media, if you don't believe that national politicians
could be responsible
for what happened in downtown Toronto.

If
guys like Harper, or Day were involved in managing security forces
during the G20 protests the voters need to be made aware, and
prosecutors need access to that information.

Store owners should be asking why the police allowed the vandalism to go on for 1.5 hours

Store owners defiant after property damaged during G20 riot - thestar.com
Police have admitted that they were ordered to allow the vandalism, including the burning of of the police cars. Everyone should be asking why were they ordered to allow the vandalism to happen and go on for so long.

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

G20 Toronto - Demand for Public Inquiry Continues to Grow

Amnesty International, The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the NDP, Liberals and Bloc, and members of the ever-growing Facebook group Canadians Demanding a Public Inquiry Into Toronto G20 (currently at 27,000+ members), CUPE, The Canadian Labour Congress, and many others are calling for a public inquiry into the actions and inactions of the police and other security and rights issues during the G20 weekend in downtown Toronto.

UPDATE: Joints lawsuit planned for G20 arrestees - Toronto Star
Blair has announced an internal police review, but there are growing demands for a public inquiry, with the Public Service Alliance of Canada, Greenpeace and 121 signatories from the York University faculty recently joining the chorus of voices asking for an independent probe. The Criminal Lawyers’ Association is also calling for an independent fact-finder to probe the circumstances surrounding the G20 arrests and NDP critic Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) has requested the House of Commons public safety committee be recalled to study issues surrounding summit security.


The CCLA has a petition you can sign that they will be sending to the provincial and federal governments to ask for a public inquiry.

Canadians Advocating Political Participation (CAPP) Demands Public Inquiry.

There is a rally in Toronto at Queen's Park, Thursday July 1, 2001 at 5:30pm to call for a public inquiry. Facebook group for the rally at this link.

On July 17th from 1-3pm, there will be nation-wide rallies to call for a public inquiry as well as to let government know that we will stand up for our rights. Facebook link: G20 Protest: Defend Your Rights.

G20 Toronto - Police chief Bill Blair lied about laws, orders, weapons, rubber bullets, illegal arrests, detention conditions, rape threats, ...

Bill Blair, the Toronto police chief, should be fired. He lied to the public and to his officers on a number of matters that are very serious.

Here are some links to posts and news all about it.
Globe & Mail: Police admit no five-metre rule existed on security fence law

Runesmith: Breach of Peace, Breach of Trust

Globe & Mail: 'Weapons' seized in G20 arrests not what they seem - police display items confiscated in unrelated incidents

Blair lies, citizen rights in the toilet

Chief Blair MUST be fired

Sex, Lies and videotape

G20 Toronto - "a clear order from the command centre saying 'Do not engage'

We know now that the vandalism on Sat. June 26th in downtown Toronto could have easily been stopped.
We also know now that the police were ordered to let it happen.
... As downtown Toronto witnessed burning police cars and a small group of thugs on a rampage, a police source tells me the only thing that stopped the officers from doing that was an order telling them not to. They tell me they could have rounded up all, or most of them, in no time.

I have had several frontline police officers tell me they were told not to get involved. But even before that decision was made, says one insider, there was mass confusion and indecision.

"The orders went from engage to, no, don't engage to engage to, no, don't engage,' " said an officer. "It was an absolute shambles. Everyone was talking over each other on the radio. Nobody seemed to know what to do. It was just a mess."

The officer said that eventually there was "a clear order from the command centre saying 'Do not engage' "
...
So who made that order?

Was it Chief Bill Blair? Mayor David Miller? Prime Minister Stephen Harper? Somebody else?

The inevitable inquiry, separate from the announced internal police review, will have to address this and a whole lot of other things. For example, why were a record 1,000 arrests made a day after the actual incident where very few arrests were made during it?...


More news, videos, first-hand evidence on this issue at these two posts:

June 27 - G20 Protest in Toronto - Police stood by and did nothing while damage was being done

G20 Toronto - "Don't play public relations, do your goddamned job!"

Naomi Klein captured the essence of one of the main issues with the police over the G20 weekend when she told the police at the protest rally on Monday: "Don't play public relations, do your goddamned job!" She was referring to how it seems that the police allowed the black block to vandalize downtown and allow the police cars to burn for a long time so the mainstream media could capture the images, thus making it seem like a lot of expense on security was indeed needed.

Were the burning police cars bait?
"Questions are being asked as to why the police chose to drive the
vehicles into the middle of a group of protesters and then abandon them,
and why there was no attempt to put out the flames until the nation’s
media had been given time to record the scenes for broadcast around the
world.”

Video - Protesters amuse themselves playing with the sirens and lights in two
police cruisers inexplicably driven into the crowd and then abandoned
in the middle of the street. Calling in to dispatch, making airplane
noises on the mike for the crowd, and handing out tickets — it’s all
rather jovial.

Kid lights a paper fire on the passenger seat, someone else puts it
out, and a short altercation about safety ensues. Another guy writes on
the cruiser in green paint: “This is bait, aka a prop.”

Kid on the mike in the cruiser: “For $1.2 billion dollars, thanks for
all your photography. This will be on the news tonight justifying the
whole event.”

There was plenty of time and opportunity for the police to go back and get the cars, yet they didn't - they just left them there and when they were set on fire, the let them burn. They weren't doing their job. And by not doing their job (stopping the vandalism, removing their cars, allowing the burning cars to be extinguished) they jeopardized public safety.

Here is another video showing the 2 police cars on Queen St West near Spadina. You can see that there are no "black block" people around anymore, just people hanging out. The reporter explains that initially the police in these cars were attacked by "black block" people and so they abandoned them. But, why did they not come in force and get them back when the "black block" left the area? The most likely answer: so the cars would be vandalized and maybe burned - bait for a publicity stunt. Instead of doing their jobs, the police played public relations.

Another first-hand account regarding the police leaving the cars on Queen St. West.
... But it was at Queen Street that things changed and, from what I
witnessed, it was the police who changed it.


After the parade had more or less left the area, we saw the police block
off a section of Queen Street around Peter Street. They drove two
police cars into the area and then left them in the road, next to people
on the street with their windows open and gear on the front seat. The
police left the area, but they left both cars behind, windows open and
unattended. We thought this was very strange, given their public
statements of concern about vandalism.


At this time I saw perhaps three broken windows on store fronts along
Queen Street. We left the area for a while to walk along the perimeter
of the security fence (it was easy to get to and there were no
demonstrators). It was very peaceful and we joked with police inside the
fence.


Coming back up Spadina Avenue, about 6:25pm we saw smoke coming up from
Queen Street just east of Spadina. We went, along with a number of
others, to see what the smoke was all about. Again we saw no, or very
few black-hooded demonstrators, in fact most of the demonstrators had
dispersed and, from the film we took, most of the people seemed to be
ordinary citizens, many residents in the area, taking pictures with
their cell phones.


When we got there couple of minutes later, we saw that it was one of the
police cars the police had abandoned earlier that was on fire. The fire
department had the situation well in hand and were putting out the
fire. Again, Toronto police had formed a perimeter with their bikes and
no one was getting in the way of officers or firemen doing their duty.


At about 6:35, a phalanx of riot squad officers marched up Queen from
Spadina, which everyone thought was rather silly, given there was no
trouble. About 6:45, the riot police (mostly OPP officers) backed us all
to the east side of the intersection of Queen and Spadina. No one
resisted or even objected, until they began to push us into the
intersection and into northbound traffic.


Once they had done that, they began to threatened citizens with arrest
if we didn't get off the road they had pushed us into. They pushed the
crowd (which was not large compared to earlier in the day) right through
the intersection and then blocked the intersection. I thought they
might be clearing it for emergency vehicles, but none came out of Queen
that way.


Finally, after making everyone angry, the police left the intersection
and Queen Street. They again left the second police car behind. Shortly
after that, just after 7:50pm, we saw smoke billowing up from the second
police car. Small explosions erupted from the car and the flames were
very high, threatening nearby property. Again, we wondered why the
police had abandoned their squad cars in an area where they must have
known some people would be tempted to destroy them.


This time, no fire trucks came. The mood of the crowd was not one that
would lead me to believe that anyone would have interfered if fire
trucks arrived. However, the riot squad came back up Spadina Avenue from
south of Queen Street. They cleared the intersection again and made
several bluff runs at people there. However, we saw no fire trucks come
and it appeared as though the police were letting their car burn out of
control.


We left the area not long after being cleared north of the intersection
of Spadina and Queen along with some other folk who told us they too
were very puzzled by the actions of police. I heard more than one person
comment that the police seemed to be more interested in pushing people
around than in dealing with public safety matters. Indeed the whole
Queen Street operation had the air of something planned, and we could
not escape the feeing that the police wanted the cars burned so they
could justify further action, including, at about 8:30pm, clearing
Queen's Park (the area designated as the official protest zone) of
people who had gathered there.


Now there may well have been vandalism by black sweat-shirted teenagers
elsewhere, but on Queen Street, on the evening of June 26 all the
dangerous provocation I saw came from riot-suited police men and women.
And it wasn't necessary.

UPDATE - included in THIS video is a segment showing a few black block attacking a police car with the police inside, and then police reinforcements show up. The black block have quickly departed and the protester crowd is giving the police and the cars lots of space, but the police just leave the cars, open, as bait. Later in the same video, you can see police cars abandoned and burning at other locations, but there is space around them - the fires could have been put out, the cars could have been moved.

More regarding police inaction during the vandalism:
According to long-time social justice activist an author Judy Rebick
who was at a press conference with police representatives today
[June 29, 2010]
, the
Toronto police have admitted to receiving stand-down orders while
property destruction took place
and many people suspect that police cars
were abandoned in the middle of streets as decoys to attract vandalism
and were left to burn for over 30 minutes for media photo-ops. Many
believe that the police used this situation as a pretence to brutally
repress protesters not involved in property destruction (about 50 to 100
people were involved in the vandalism while nearly 1000 have been
arrested).


from Filibuster
I have no doubt there were plenty of regular police officers who were angered and shamed by the fact that vandals were allowed to rampage for an hour and a half through Toronto on Saturday.
...
I also spoke to a retired police officer/consultant from Michigan. I wanted to know if there could have been a mobile squad that could detach as needed to pursue these vandals. He said it was absolutely standard operating procedure to have a quick response team in place. I'm going to assume things were planned well enough that there was such a force, and that it simply wasn't deployed. Not only was this a tactical failure, but it's turning into a public relations failure as well.

"The bosses of this police force and other police forces decided to play public relations, and instead of doing their jobs, they let the city burn," said Naomi Klein on Monday.

Yep, show the public just what kind of violent elements there are, and maybe that will justify the massive expense. And in making that decision, a volatile situation was made more so. It was immediately after the vandalism that things got ugly. Decent cops were humiliated and angered, innocent people were rounded up and stripped of their rights.


More news, videos, first-hand evidence on this issue at these two posts:

June 27 - G20 Protest in Toronto - Police stood by and did nothing while damage was being done

June 28 - G20 Protest in Toronto - Police stood by and did nothing while damage was being done. Part 2




Tuesday, 29 June 2010

G20 Toronto - Damages. Who Should Pay?

Pressure builds on Ottawa for compensation - thestar.com
Considering that the Harper government foisted the summit on downtown Toronto, and considering that the Toronto Police (who were in charge of all the policing outside of the security area) stood by and did nothing and allowed the black block vandals to vandalize for 1.5 hours without stepping in to stop them, I would recommend that the federal government and the Toronto Police split the bill to compensate businesses who had property damaged. The city could take the amount to be paid by the Toronto Police out of their next year's budget and just give them that much less.
It only seems fair.

Naomi Klein speaks at the police station rally June 28th

Monday, 28 June 2010

Protest against police brutality - evening update June 28, 2010

The rally seems to have moved from Nathan Phillips Square up to Queens Park and has grown to about 3,000.
The rally ended peacefully after 10pm. From what I've read and seen, there weren't riot-gear police, just normally suited police and bicycle police. No arrest and no police brutality. But the police did stop and ask many people for ID.

Photos

Toronto Media Coop
Naomi Klein says stop playing politics and let them go #g20report Monday June 28 2010 9:30pm [regarding the people illegally detained at the Eastern Ave detention centre]

pls be careful exiting march, unmarked
vans are following people & questioning them #G20report Monday June 28 2010 9:10pm

TorontoPolicePR: We've already recovered sufficient evidence of police
misconduct from all those journalists we arrested and strip searched.
#g20 #g20report Monday June 28 2010 8:59pm

3k strong at Queens Park! #G20report #G20 http://tweetphoto.com/29735577 Monday June 28 2010 8:51pm

March going north on university to queen,s park #g20report Monday June 28 2010 8:50pm

prisoner solidarity march back to dundas and university, chanting
away... #g20report Monday June 28 2010
8:26pm

Heading out of Nathan Phillips square #g20report http://tweetphoto.com/29730798 Monday June 28 2010 8:10pm


Thought the police were holding up traffic on Queen in front of city
hall, turns out it's police in a fleet of minivans #g20report Monday
June 28 2010 8:08pm





CBC News: G20 Protests Continue

rally-klein-1838.jpg
Activist Naomi Klein takes part in the rally. (Patrick Morell/CBC)
rally-crowd-1831.jpg
T
he crowd fills College Street. (Patrick Morrell/CBC)

CBC News: Crowd Protests Police G20 Actions
Another large, noisy, traffic-stopping protest erupted in downtown Toronto on Monday, with about 1,000 demonstrators marching through the streets, angry at what they said was police overreaction during weekend G20 protests.

There was a peaceful, two-hour rally on College Street, outside the headquarters of the Toronto Police Service, with chanting, drumming, and a call for the release of those protesters still being held in detention.

The protest closed a section of College Street, affecting car and pedestrian traffic, as well as one of the city's busiest streetcar lines, for a large portion of the afternoon rush hour.

After about two hours of peaceful protest, the group moved off westbound, then headed south on University Avenue, which is lined with hospitals, insurance companies and the U.S. consulate.

The protesters continued their marched through the streets of the city, followed by police, snaking their way through Nathan Phillips Square in front of Toronto City Hall.


Western Standard: I was just harassed by Toronto Police
It happened just a few minutes ago. I was sitting down on
University Avenue, when a group of police officers approached me and
said they wanted to talk to me. Stunned, I opened my mouth getting
ready to reply to the request, when one of the officers at the top of
his lungs yelled: "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU THINK!"


Another officer said they didn't want to hear about my rights.



They then proceeded to demand I remove the earphones from my ears,
forcing me to get off the phone with my colleague. I told them I was on
the phone to which another officer responded, "we don't care."

Then they said they wanted to search my bag, because I was "wearing a

black shirt". To which I replied, that I did not consent to any
searches. I told them that I would not resist them, and that any search
they conducted was under protest. They simply said, "we don't care.
We want to make sure you don't have any bombs to kill us with."

They demanded I present identification, once again I complied under

protest. To which they told me they didn't care again.

Then one of the officers told me that, and I quote, that I (me)

"don't care about the security of the city." To which I protested. They
then called me "ignorant".

I asked them why they were using such vulgar language with me, and

they simply denied that any such language had been used. Despite having
literally sworn at me multiple times, seconds prior.

There was one police officer, who was mostly quiet, who seemed to be

looking at me somewhat sympathetically. I sensed that he was not
comfortable with what his fellow officers were doing.

But I was just subjected to an warrant-less, suspicion-less search,

contrary to my Charter Rights. And when I protested my treatment, I was
repeatedly told that they "don't care". They accused me of not caring
about the security of Toronto, and they called me ignorant twice. I
should note that I was never given any chance to really say much to them
at all, so I can only assume that they had some prior knowledge of who I
was.

I assert that I was just criminally harassed by the Toronto Police.

And I would swear a legal affidavit on the above facts.


Posted by Mike Brock on June 28, 2010




MyNews CTV: Surrounded and arrested by police
from Sunday evening at Queen & Spadina - more evidence of police brutality
Posted by Jason MacDonald. Uploaded 2010-06-28
- watch the video at the link above -
WARNING: Strong language and violence that may upset some viewers.
MyNews user Jason MacDonald, a 27-year-old construction worker from
Toronto, submitted this chilling first-hand video of a tense standoff
with police on Sunday.
MacDonald told CTV.ca his group marched peacefully along Queen from Bay
Street to Spadina, where they were surrounded by police in riot gear.
“We kind of got surrounded and weren’t able to get out, they just pushed
us back and I

was trying to film, and the one officer lunged forward
smashed me in the face with his shield and one by one they arrested us,
all of us,” MacDonald alleged.
In addition to the cut to his face, MacDonald alleges he received
bruises to his ribs, head and both arms, as well as scratches to his
back from being dragged by police officers.
Eventually, MacDonald and his friends were all arrested and taken to a
detention centre. He was eventually released at about 11:30 p.m.




Rabble.ca - In His Own Words: Guardian journalist arrested by G20 security forces
33 minute interview. Listen at the link
Jesse Rosenfeld was writing for The Guardian newspaper when G20
security beat him up and arrested him. Amy Goodman on what it means to
have a real independent media.
1:48 - 13:45 Jesse Rosenfeld was writing for The Guardian when G20
security beat him up and arrested him. rabble radio spoke to him a few
hours after he was released from detention.

14:08 - 32:15 Amy Goodman is the host of the radio/tv/podcast
Democracy Now! Friday night, at the Council of Canadians event Shout Out
For Global Justice, she spoke about what it means to have an
independent media, and why it is important.


Rabble.ca - Judy Rebick: On Saturday's G20 arrests and detentions

2:38 minutes - listen at the link

The author, writer and journalist argues that police arrested “the most
important grassroots organizers in the province” on Saturday to try and
discredit them. “Hopefully, the media will smell a rat and start to see
that this whole thing was a setup,” she said, in an interview on Sunday
afternoon.


LondonFuse.ca: Growing Number of Serious Allegations About Police Treatment of Detainees in During G20 Summit
Video interviews with Jesse Rosenfeld - The Guardian and Independent Journalist, and with Amy Miller of Alternative Media Centre.


Maggie Knight: The World Is Watching: G20 Media Summary to Date (June 28, 2010)
Includes a lot of interesting links. Links to interviews with and stories of journalists being arrested and detained. One very disturbing item included in the video interview above with Amy Miller - "Amy Miller says she was told she would be repeatedly raped so she would never want to be a journalist again." She also saw a number of young women, who were detained, being strip searched and cavity searched by male officers.


Urgent: Conditions at 629 Eastern Ave. Illegal, Immoral, Dangerous

WE ARE CALLING AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. IN THE
MEANTIME, DISTRIBUTE THIS LINK AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE.

We (i.e., Justin Giovannetti and Lex Gill) are both able and

willing to testify in front of a court of law, tribunal or hearing to
attest to the validity of these statements. Much of this is now recorded
on video and we have some contact information for the victims. We will
NOT consent to contact with any police representatives (municipal,
provincial, or federal) nor will we consent to speaking to other
security agencies (CSIS, Canadian Forces, etc.). We can be contacted at
lex.gill [at] gmail [dot] com, or jackgiovannetti [at] gmail [dot] com.


We just got back to our computers and are frantically writing this
message. It is 4:45 a.m. on Monday morning. We are the only people who
seem to know the extent of this story. Coffee and adrenaline keeping us
going. When we got to Queen and Spadina after leaving the Convergence
Centre raid today, we had already been blocked off by police lines. It
was pouring rain, and we could hear a confrontation taking place further
down the street. The cops didn’t care whether or not we were media — in
fact, we heard that media was forced to leave before we arrived. Police
acted violently and with sheer disregard for the law, attacking
peaceful protesters and civilians unrelated to the protest. Tired,
frantic, and feeling defeated, we came home and posted the message
before this one.


We then did the only thing left to do, and headed to 629 Eastern
Avenue (the G20 Detention Centre, a converted film studio), where
detainees from the demonstrations were being taken. We knew people were
being released sporadically so we grabbed as many juice boxes and
granola bars as we could afford and set off with medical supplies.
Journalists were basically absent, showed up only to take a few seconds
of video, or simply arrived far too late to be effective.


It is next to impossible to set the scene of what happened at the
Detention Centre. Between the two of us we estimate that we spoke to
over 120 people, most of whom were released between 9:30 p.m. and 4:30
a.m. Despite not knowing each other, the story they tell is the same. It
goes like this. Most were arrested at three locations: the Novotel on
Saturday evening where the police arrested hundreds of peaceful
protesters (look @spaikin on Twitter); Spadina/Queen’s Park all day
Saturday and early Sunday, as people were arrested all over the downtown
for many different (and often bogus) reasons; and the University of
Toronto, where hundreds of Quebecers and others were woken up and
arrested at gun point early Saturday morning.


What follows is a list, as detailed as we can make it in a blog post,
of what we saw and heard.


People were held for up to 35 hours with a single meal. None
seemed to have received food more than twice daily, the meal they did
receive was a hamburger bun with processed cheese and margarine
described as a centimeter thick. Detainees had to create loud noises for
hours to receive any food at all. All reported feeling more ill and
dehydrated after eating than before. Some vomited and received no
medical attention when they did. Water was not provided with the meal.
Inadequate water, as little as an ounce every 12 hours.

Although
some people reported receiving approximately an ounce (a small Dixie
cup) of water every three hours, most seemed to have received far less
than that. They had to create loud noises and continuously demand water,
only to receive it up to an hour and a half later. Sometimes rooms with
over a dozen people were only given a handful (four or five) cups of
water and forced to share. Some reported the water as yellow-coloured
and smelling of urine, which they didn’t drink.
Facilities over-capacity.

There were many reports of “cages”
filled with 40 people, though a police officer told one detainee that
they were intended for groups of no more than 15 to 20. Each cage had a
single bench, with only enough seating for five people. There was only
one toilet in each cage and it was without a door. Women were creating
barriers with their bodies for others to create some semblance of
privacy.
Major delays in processing.

Many detainees were told that the only
reason they remained at the Centre was due to unexplained delays in
processing. Most detainees seemed to go through a three step system
whereby they were put in an initial holding cell, only to be moved to a
second cell after meeting a Staff Sergeant in a board room. This is
where they were told what they were arrested for. Eventually they were
moved to a third cell before release. This process seemed to take no
less than 10 hours. Others were never told why they were arrested and
never signed any documents. A few were released immediately upon
arriving at the Centre and were never processed. Some were never brought
to a cell, only made to wait in a line to be let out.
Inconsistent charges.

Groups arrested at the same time and for
the same behaviour were given different charges, with some let out and
others given court dates. Many felt the police simply assigned a charge
or did not know why they were being arrested. Some charges were changed
or dropped before the detainees were released.
People put in solitary confinement.

Most of the openly queer
detainees reported to have been transferred to a “Segregated Zone.” In
cages built for one, couples of men and women were held. A lesbian is
reported to have spent nearly 10 hours alone. Another woman said she was
kept alone in a large cell for hours, asking to be moved the whole
time.
No pillows or mattresses to sleep.

No bedding was ever provided
for detainees, who were told to sleep on bare concrete floors. Detainees
were stripped of all but a single shirt and legwear. Many said they
could not sleep during their day long detentions.
Unsanitary and unsafe living conditions.

Many of the floors of
the cages were covered with dirt and the residue from green paintballs
used to identify suspects in crowds. Vomit was also on the floor and no
cleaning of the cages took place.
Police intimidation of released detainees.

With many of the
detainees released and standing across the street from the detention
centre, getting food and water from community volunteers while waiting
for friends, police stood menacingly across the road. Almost all the
detainees were frightened by the police presence and feared an attack.
The police used the headlights of rental Dodge Caravans to light up the
crowd, citing a need to “keep them visible.”
Non-stop light exposure/loss of natural light rhythm/sensory
deprivation.

Detainees emerged with a broken day/night cycle, being
deprived of all connection to the outside world or any other time-based
events (ie. set eating times). While in their cages, detainees were
subject to constant light.
Exposure to extreme cold.

Detainees complained of the air
conditioning in the building being very high. Many of them said that
they were frozen and asked for blankets, a request which was always
refused. Due to having only a single layer of shirt and sleeping on
concrete floors, the cages were extremely cold.
Sexual harassment of women and Queer people.

We heard many
first-hand accounts of cat-calls and crude sexual comments directed at
women from police officers at the Centre. Some women faced inappropriate
sexual contact (including one girl who was forced to endure a police
officer covering her body with detainee number stickers in order to
touch her), and rough handling from police officers. Openly Queer boys
were told to “straighten up,” and there was at least one completely nude
strip search preformed on a young woman with no reasonable explanation.
It is unclear whether the strip searches that took place were
consistently conducted by members of the same gender. It is also unclear
as to whether any Transpeople, if detained, were put in cells of a
gender of their own determination or in cells of a police gender
assignment.
Youth as young as 15 in adult cells.

Youth (under 18) detainees
were held in the same cells as adults, some of whom had not been charged
at all (and thus it could not be justified that they were being held on
adult charges). A 16-year-old was held in an adult cell for at least 12
hours, the police were fully aware of his age, and his parents were at
no point contacted.
Denial of legal counsel.

When detainees asked to see lawyers they
were told that they would receive legal counsel at a later time or at
the time of processing. Often, these times went by and no legal counsel
was provided. Those released without charge were told to avoid
contacting lawyers. Most detainees said they were never informed of
their rights.
No phone call.

About only one in ten of the detainees we spoke to
had been given access to a phone. Others were promised access at a
later time and never received it. There was a father waiting outside for
his 20-year old son who had been arrested Saturday afternoon or
evening, and had yet to receive a call. Many of the detainees were told
that only 20 phones were available in the building, holding over 500
detainees at the time. The offices of legal counsel also had no
landlines.
Belonging stolen/damaged.

Most detainees reported that at least
some of their confiscated belongings were not returned to them,
including passports, wallets, credit and debit cards, money, cellphones
and clothing. When detainees were escorted outside the Centre, many were
made to walk on the street without access to their shoes (sealed in
thick plastic bags only returned at the limit of the Centre’s property).
Some shoes were missing entirely. At least one extremely visually
impaired detainee’s glasses were put with his belongings and were
severely damaged when he recovered them (ie. broken in half).
Threats of assault/harassment.

Many detainees, but especially
French Canadian detainees (who were not served in French), were taunted
and threatened with assault. Homophobic slurs were used by guards and
one was told that if he was ever seen again in Toronto the cop would
attack him. Other degrading comments were made, including telling
detainees that they “looked like dogs.”
Obviously illegal civilian arrests.

Some civilians who were
completely uninvolved in the demonstrations were arrested while exiting
subway stations in the downtown core. Some were arrested after illegal
searches of cars turned up “dangerous goods” (like books about activism
and lemon juice). One fully-uniformed TTC streetcar driver was arrested
for hours. He had been ordered out of his streetcar by riot police and
was immediately arrested. We wish we were kidding.
No access to medication or medical treatment.

While doing medical
support, Lex met at least two people who had been denied medication.
The first was a woman who said that she was pre-diabetic and needed
medication for nausea and dizziness. She was denied access to medical
treatment, despite the fact that by the time Lex found her she was
extremely faint, barely conscious, and had difficulty sitting up. The
second was a young man who was prescribed anti-psychotics and had missed
several doses (he did not, however, have an episode at the time Lex met
him). We heard stories of at least one person with Type 2 diabetes
inside the Centre who had been deprived of insulin and fell unconscious.
Many stories of a man handcuffed to a wheelchair, missing a leg (and
his prosthetic) came from the released detainees. One recently-released
detainee had four extremely poorly done stitches on his chin and was
uncertain as to what shots (whether tetanus or anesthetic, or both) he
was given. He was given the stitches at the time of his arrest and the
wound was still bleeding badly (we had to sterilize it and applied
gauze).
Abandonment

Despite all of the above mentioned crimes against
detainees, most notably including medical issues, the Toronto Police had
no plan for the detainees after they were released. They were simply
escorted off the property and told to leave. Many had no idea where they
were, had no access to a phone, had not eaten in a day, had no
identification or money on their person, and were nowhere near mass
transit. Had community volunteers and fellow released detainees not been
present to assist them, we fear that some could have faced
life-threatening medical emergencies or death.


We will be continually updating this blog over the next few weeks.
Please share this with everyone you possibly can. People must know what
has happened in Toronto. For those of you attending the Jail Solidarity
rally tomorrow, please distribute this link widely.


QUICK UPDATE: Its been five hours since we posted this entry and
it’s climbing by hundreds of hits every half hour. According to those on
the ground, detainees leaving the Centre seem to now be avoiding the
group of supporters outside waiting for them. We fear this is due to
police intimidation within 629 Eastern Ave.. If anyone has further
reports, please post in the comment section.


Thank you.


For Justice,


Justin Giovannetti and Lex Gill